Sunday, June 22, 2014

On the Public Relations Warpath


     Dan Snyder and the Washington Redskins organization have handled this name change debate rather poorly.  Every time they have come to a fork in the road they have taken the road less traveled, and these roads are not the noble ones Robert Frost was talking about.  From publicly stating that the name will never be changed, to trotting out Native American representatives with dubious resumes to justify the non-racial slur connotation of “Redskin”, to openly defying congressional suggestions to change the name, Daniel Snyder has put himself in the position of Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burns in a fire he created and continues to fuel.  Public relations has never been Dan Snyder’s strong suit, but this name change debate conclusively illustrates that Dan Snyder does not care that he is despised by pretty much every human being with a pulse at this moment.  HogsHaven points out the consequences his actions have had on the changing of the Redskins name, and it is worth a read to highlight what keeping the name means at this moment and who is really on that side of the debate.  Despite all of this negativity coming down on Snyder and the organization, however, they can still win the PR battle.  With only a few minor changes, Dan Snyder can silence all of his critics’ rebuttals and pay his penance to the public and fan base for this egregious handling of the name change debate.  Please note that most of these are not my original ideas, but I hope the combination of these ideas are the way the team chooses to go.

1) Keep the color scheme and the logo
            This will soften the blow to the significant part of the fan base that thinks the name should not be changed.  Everyone loves the burgundy and gold, and I would hate to have to change that color scheme and wear some heinous concoction that some marketing “wizard” comes up with.  The Washington football team, whatever we end up being called, should forever be burgundy and gold.
            We can also keep the logo because that is not up for debate in the lawsuit being brought forth by Amanda Blackhorse.  The court decision was on the trademarking of the name “Redskins”, but the logo can still be trademarked.  Keep the logo and you win over more of the fan base, and it sets up the next two possibilities for Dan Snyder to win this argument

2) Change the name to the “Warriors”
            I must admit that I first heard this on the Sport Junkies radio show, and I’m sure that others came up with it before then, but changing the name to the “Warriors” while keeping the same logo and color scheme gives Snyder the high ground.  Snyder can brand it as an homage to the Native Americans who were the first “Warriors” of this country and who need to be remembered for their bravery in the face of tyranny and oppression.  He can say that we should never forget the injustices that were committed towards Native Americans in the past, and that this new team will serve as a beacon that will illuminate the sins of our past so we may create a brighter future for the Native American people.  He could set up charities and organizations to help the Native American community.  He could publicly entertain Native American leaders at Fed Ex field and turn this into a positive for him and the organization.  He can also use the name to honor the men and women of the Armed Forces (this idea came directly from the Sports Junkies).  Think about it; the team in the Nation’s Capital honoring those who defend this country with a rebranded name. 
            Who could argue against keeping the logo and color scheme now? I’m sure there will be many who say that Snyder is doing this to build his image back up from being a borderline racist, but now those people look cynical and inconsiderate of the Native Americans and those who fight in the Armed Forces.  Not exactly the most popular stance to take, and Snyder could reference that point every time someone decides to call him out on this PR move.   “Oh, I guess you do not support our troops?”, or “Maybe the plight of the Native American people is just a gimmick to you, but it is serious to us”.  As long as Snyder is committed to this idea the haters will slowly go away and his image will improve with time.  If he is not good with this idea, there is another solution that may win over most people.

3) Have no name at all
            This is somewhat of a Prince move, but keep the colors and logo and have no nickname.  Using the logo will open the door to say this move is out of respect for the Native Americans and to keep their legacy and struggle in the forefront of American culture like the “Warriors” idea, but it can also be used to galvanize the Washington area.  Snyder can do this by replacing the word “Redskins” with “Washington” on all organizational apparel and merchandise, and he can brand it as being a move for the Washington DC area.  He could say something like:
            “This football team has been a unifying force for this city for over 75 years, and everyone who has lived in this area knows that the name symbolizes a community coming together to support a common interest.  This team transcended all boundaries of social stratification to create a positive experience for everyone in this city regardless of how good or bad the times were.  The fans of this team knew that the name was not a symbol of hate, but it was a moniker that brought people together in joyous celebration of what has become an American tradition.  Football.  But over the years, the outside focus on the negative connotation of this word has grown to a point that cannot be ignored by anyone, especially myself (Dan Snyder) and the leaders of this organization.  We understand that the name conjures feelings of hate and bigotry in members of the Native American community, and we cannot continue to put our fans in the position of being perceived as racists simply for wearing the name of their favorite team that has meant something positive to them for their entire lives.  We also understand that this team has been a part of three generations of fans living in this area, and to use a different name would be turning our backs on the one tradition this city has been able rally around since FDR was in office.  That is why I (Dan Snyder) and the leaders of this organization have decided to adopt no name for our organization.  In this way we can carry on the tradition that we have always known, while moving forward with a respectful representation of the Native American community that has felt marginalized by the use of a term they felt was demeaning towards their people.  We will keep the logo in remembrance of the legacy and struggles the Native American people have had to endure to make this country what it is today, and to create a partnership that will help them continue to create a positive story for their people in the future.  We will keep the logos and colors to honor the tradition that has been Washington football for over 75 years.  Not having a nickname now puts the focus on what this team was, and always has been, about.  The fans and the people of this city.  We will forever be the burgundy and gold, and we are Washington Football.”

Cue Agent Smith.  This speech would hit a home run.  It will rally the fan base, something Snyder has never done, and it would put the idea that this team was about unity to the forefront of the argument.  He could also continue to hit that point home, that this is about the Washington community, and give this area a sense of self.  Everyone always says how transient this area is and how it has no identity.  This move could give the fan base an identity it has never had before, and a sense of unity that could make it stronger than ever before.

I implore Dan Snyder to take this PR advice but I know he won’t.  He’ll continue on his litigious warpath that will alienate everyone, including the fan base, until he perceives to get whatever delusional reward he has in mind as the end game to this scenario.  Thanks Dan, and keep up the “good?” work.

No comments:

Post a Comment